The period of European history which we call “Medieval” is usually regarded as consisting of the thousand years or so between the fall of the Roman empire in the west (around 400 CE), through to the start of the Italian Renaissance (in c. 1400). In fact, the term was coined by later historians, and means “Middle Ages”, which might today be rendered as “in-between times” – that period which came after the high civilizations of the Greeks and Romans, and before the high civilization of the Renaissance: an age of barbarism and ignorance, of illiteracy and violence.
We still get an echo of this in the ideas surrounding the term “Gothic” – dark, gloomy, foreboding. In fact, though, modern historians regard these centuries as the cradle of the modern age, a time when many elements of our society which we value – democracy, industrialisation, science and so on, had their roots. It was one of the most fascinating and transformative eras in world history.
Facade of Reims Cathedral France
Reproduced under Creative Commons 3.0.
This thousand-year long period can be divided into three main phases, of unequal length. The five-plus centuries after the fall of Rome (up to c.1000) have been called the Dark Ages, and witnessed a dramatic decline in the level of material civilisation. Long distance trade shrank, the currency collapsed, the economy mostly reverted to barter, and the towns diminished drastically in size. Literacy, and with it learning, all but vanished. European society was reshaped with the rise of self-sufficient manors, then of horse-soldiers (knights), and finally of feudalism. The Church, already highly influential by the time of the western Roman empire’s fall, strengthened its hold on society.
The period of the High Middle Ages, from about 1000 to 1350, was the high water mark of medieval civilization, leaving a durable legacy in the soaring cathedrals and massive castles which sprang up all over Europe. From about 1350 to 1500 the period of the late Middle Ages was a time of transition, seeing the emergence of modern Europe.
By definition the civilization of medieval Europe lay in Europe. However, in terms of those features we associate with medieval society – feudalism, chivalry, Christendom and so on – the location changed over time, and never really covered all of Europe.
The roots of many medieval elements of society had their geographical origins in the provinces of the late Roman empire, mainly Gaul (France), Spain and Italy. When the Roman empire collapsed and these provinces were overrun by barbarian tribes, the synthesis between Roman and German cultures eventually produced a recognisably “feudal” society – which is one of the defining feature of medieval European civilization (though the word “feudalism” needs some careful handling). This distinguishes the areas of the old western Roman empire from that of the eastern Roman empire. Here, Roman power survived for a thousand years longer than in the west, centred on Constantinople. Modern scholars describe this as the Byzantine empire, and it came to influence much of eastern Europe. We will deal with the Byzantine empire and the regions it influenced in separate articles.
Western Europe, plus those parts of northern and central Europe which became part of the same cultural community, formed a very distinct society in medieval times: a civilization whose roots lay in the Christian, Latin-speaking provinces of the late Roman empire and the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded them. As time went by the borders of this civilization changed. Peripheral areas were added: England in the 6th century, the Low Countries in the 7th, the German peoples in the 8th and 9th centuries, and the Scandinavians and western Slavic peoples in the 10th and 11th centuries. Meanwhile, much of Spain was lost when the Muslims seized it in the 8th century, and only gradually regained.
Medieval European society grew out of the ruins of the Roman empire. From the 5th century onwards, barbarian invasions led to the disintegration of Roman power in the western provinces. These territories also experienced a sharp decline in material civilisation. A literate, complex urban society gave way to an almost illiterate, much simpler and more rural one.
Much, however, continued from one era to the next. Most notably, the Christian Church survived the fall of the Roman empire to become the predominant cultural influence in medieval Europe. The Latin language continued in use as the language of the Church; and at a popular level vulgar Latin morphed into the Romance languages of modern Europe, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. Much of the learning of Greece and Rome was preserved by the Church, and Roman law influenced the law codes of the barbarian kingdoms. Late Roman art and architecture continued in use for the few stone church buildings still being erected, and eventually would evolve into the medieval Romanesque and Gothic styles.
The feudal system (as modern scholars call it) first emerged in France in the 10th century, and spread to other lands in the 11th century. The word “feudal” derives from the word fief, which usually denotes an area of land held on certain conditions. A person who granted a fief to someone was that person’s lord, and the person who received a fief became the lord’s vassal. The vassal usually had to provide the lord with military service, and also give him money from time to time, and advice. But the lord also had duties towards the vassal: he had to protect him and see that he received justice in court.
Kings granted out much of their kingdoms as large fiefs to their nobles, and these in turn granted smaller fiefs for lesser lords, and so on. In this way a pyramid of mutual support was built up, stretching from the king downwards, to the lord of a single village.
The building blocks of fiefs were manors. These usually covered quite small areas of land, for example that attached to a village. The vast majority of peasants who farmed the land in medieval Europe were attached to manors, and had to provide their lords with labour or rent. They were known as serfs – peasants who were practically slaves, in that they were bound for life to the manors in which they were born. They were not allowed to leave this land, nor marry, nor pass on their particular plots to anyone, without their lords’ permission. On the other hand, they had the right to look to their lord for protection and justice.
The Church exerted a powerful influence on all aspects of life in medieval Europe. Indeed, such was the Church’s place in European society that medieval Europeans defined themselves as living in “Christendom” – the realm of the Christians.
All the key moments of life – birth, marriage, death – were under the Church’s control. Education was dominated by churchmen, and most medieval scholars in Europe were members of the clergy. The vast majority of art and architecture was religious in nature, either commissioned by churches or abbeys themselves or by wealthy lords and merchants to beautify churches. The largest and most beautiful structures in any medieval town or city were religious buildings, and their towers and spires soared above urban skylines.
The Romanesque Church of Maria Lach, Germany
Reproduced under creative commons 3.0
The Church was a the wealthiest landowner in western Europe. It was also a hugely powerful international organisation, challenging and constraining the authority of emperors and kings. Senior churchmen were ministers and high officials to secular rulers, and the servants of the Church – priests, monks, nuns and other “clerks” – were tried in their own courts and by their own system of law.
The medieval Church in western Europe looked to the pope, the bishop of Rome, for leadership. For much of the high Middle Ages popes asserted their complete sovereignty over the Church. They also claimed authority over secular rulers. Although the latter eventually succeeded in resisting this claim, the struggle between the Papacy and monarchs had a profound impact on the history of western Europe.
One ubiquitous feature of medieval society was the presence of monks and nuns. Their monasteries dotted both countryside and towns, and many owned extensive lands and property.
Monastic communities had arisen at the time of the Roman empire, but in the years after its fall monasticism was given a new lease of life by the life of St Benedict of Nursa, in the late 5th and 6th centuries. He developed a code of guidelines to order the community and individual lives of monks and nuns. These were practical and moderate rules which aimed at allowing men and women to live communal lives of worship and study, separate from the rest of society whilst contributing to its welfare. Even to day they are highly regarded for their wisdom and spirituality.
Monasteries and nunneries spread throughout Europe during the Middle Ages, and monks and nuns provided much of the education, health care and practical charity to the population at large, as well as preaching the Gospel. They also preserved the learning of ancient Greece and Rome from generation to generation by copying their writings (a major undertaking before the coming of printing). They also contributed their own study and learning, which helped shape future Western thought. When universities appeared, the first teachers were monks.
For most of the Middle Ages, European society was almost entirely rural, with a very simple social structure: nobles at the top, peasants at the bottom, and very few people in between. In the later Middle Ages, however, trade expanded and towns becoming larger; more people joined the “middle classes” between peasants and lords, such as merchants, craftsmen, shopkeepers and so on.
The numerically tiny fief-holding aristocracy of nobles and knights lived in castles and manor houses. They were supported economically by the labour of the peasants, who formed the great majority of the population. The peasants lived in small scattered villages and hamlets, working on the land owned and doing a host of other jobs to provide for their everyday needs.
Medieval French manuscript illustration of the three classes of medieval society
A small but growing minority of the population (between 5 and 10%) lived in the few towns, which were tiny by modern standards – many had a 1000 inhabitants or less. These townsmen worked as merchants, craftsmen and labourers.
Other groups in society were churchmen, and also some communities of people, such as Jews, who were not really fully accepted members of the wider society.
The great lords
The aristocracy consisted mostly of a graded hierarchy of fief-holders. At the very top were the magnates. These were titled nobles such as dukes, counts (or earls in the British Isles) and barons. They stood just below kings and emperors in social rank, in wealth and in power; indeed, in many parts of Europe they were rulers in their own right, governing duchies and counties as semi-autonomous princes, owing only loose obedience to a distant monarch. Their families intermarried freely with the royal families of France, England, Germany and other kingdoms.
In the lower ranks of the aristocracy were humble knights and gentry who held only a small fief (a single manor of one knight’s fee). Indeed, many held no land at all, but belonged to a great lord’s retinue, fighting his battles and living as members of his household. They hoped for a small fief as a reward for faithful service, or perhaps as a result of marriage to the heiress of a fief-holder.
The great lords were surrounded by huge retinues, literally small (and not-so-small) armies of knights, domestic servants, retainers, and men-at-arms. Their numerous manors were supervised by bailiffs, and their complex affairs were supervised by a staff of household officials and clerks.
These lords, their households and retinues lived in strongly fortified castles. These first appeared in 9th century France to provide protection for lord and local people from the prevailing anarchy of the period. They were originally small fortified structures made of wood, sometimes standing on an artificial earth mound. They soon grew into large complexes centred on a massive fortified building made of stone (the keep).
The really great lords held several castles, and traveled frequently between them, along with their retinues. This was in fact an economic necessity, as their retinues were so large that they would soon have exhausted the resources of any one locality. However, in an age of slow communication it enabled these magnates to keep in touch with their scattered territories, and to give their dependents justice in person by presiding at the local courts under their control (see above: privatized power).
Knights and gentlemen
Below them, different ranks of aristocrats lived in lesser splendour, down to the gentleman or knight holding just one manor. His concerns were mainly to do with the affairs of the local community in which he lived. Although far less powerful than the great lord of whom he was a vassal, he had great authority over the lives of the people of his manor. He administered justice to them in his manorial court, and supervised the work of his demesne, perhaps assisted by one or two clerks. Along with his family and a small staff of domestic servants he lived in a manor house, often fortified (some looked like small castles) especially in less ordered parts of Europe.
A military class
The medieval aristocracy were steeped in a military culture – they were, in fact, a warrior class, trained from childhood in warfare. Even their leisure activities involved mock-battles called tournaments.
Knights were originally totally illiterate, thuggish retainers of kings and lords, forming their military retinues and living in their halls. As time went by, and military equipment became more expensive (larger horses, more sophisticated armour), the lords found it useful to provide many of them with their own small fiefs so that they could buy and maintain their own equipment.
From the 12th century, both lords and knights were Christianized by the church, their warlike instincts channelled into a code of chivalry which emphasised protection of the weak and the poor, respect for women and courteous behaviour to one another. A whole new idea of what it was to be a gentleman began to take shape. Aristocrats became literate and educated, better able to deal with matters of law and administration. This fitted them to serve their lords better as society became more ordered and complex. It also enabled them to look after their own estates more effectively, as written documents became more important in their management.
Peasants formed the vast majority of the population of medieval Europe. They lived in small villages, where they farmed the land and did a host of related activities.
The serfs – those unfree peasants tied to the land where they were born on an hereditary basis – had to provide the lord of the manor with various kinds of service. The most onerous of these involved working on the lord’s own land for a set number of days per week. Other obligations included giving gifts to the lord at certain times of the year, or at key moments in the peasant’s life – for example when his daughters were getting married (for which they had to ask the permission of the lord), or when a father died and the strips he had farmed were being taken over by his son(s).
Many manors, especially in England and northern Europe, practiced the open-field system of farming, in which two or three huge fields were divided into strips, with each peasant family farming several strips scattered around the fields. These were distributed so that each would get a fair share of the good and bad land. Major activities such as sowing, ploughing and harvesting were carried out jointly by the entire community.
Villages were small by modern standards, usually numbering fewer than a couple of hundred people. Each village would have had its own church, which by the 12th century would usually have been built of stone. Nearby would have been the priest’s house, and near that the “tithe barn”. This was where the villagers stored one tenth of all the grain they grew, as their tax to the church. In many villages a manor house would also have stood nearby.
A minority of peasants were not serfs, but free. Free peasants did not have the heavy feudal burdens of their unfree neighbours. They paid a rent in money or kind for the right to the use of their land, but otherwise they at liberty to live their lives as and where they wished. They could move to another village if they wanted, or to a town; they could even buy and sell land. If they owned some fields outright (perhaps having bought them from the lord) they did not even have to pay rent for them.
Compared to today, there were few towns in medieval Europe, and those that did exist were tiny. Medieval towns were usually smaller than those in classical antiquity. In 1100 or 1200 a town with 2000 inhabitants was considered large. Only a few towns and cities in Europe had more than 10,000, and those with more than 50,000 were very rare: even the city of Rome only had around 30,000. In 1066 London, by far the largest city in England, is estimated to have had 10,000 inhabitants, though four hundred years later it was probably nearer 75,000. The biggest concentrations of large towns in medieval western Europe were in Flanders (modern-day Belgium), and (much more so) in north Italy.
As time went by, and the population of Europe increased, trade and industry expanded and new towns appeared. These often grew up where a powerful lord gave a village permission to have a market: the market attracted trade, trade attracted merchants, craftsmen and workers arrived, and soon a small town was growing up. Alternatively, the presence of a castle, and the demands its inhabitants had for food, cloth and many other goods, caused the nearby village to grow into a town. As these villages were often granted permission by the lord to hold markets, so that the goods he and his household required were more readily available, this would have boosted the process of town growth further.
To modern eyes, many medieval towns would not just have been small, they would also have had quite a rural atmosphere about them. Although many towns were surrounded by walls, much of the area within the walls was given over to gardens, even fields and farms. Farm animals could be seen roaming here and there. Nevertheless, the inhabitants of towns regarded themselves as quite different from (and superior to) country folk. They had a much greater level of freedom than most peasants, and lived under the authority of their own leaders – magistrates and members of the town councils – rather than of feudal lords.
An institution of great importance in medieval times was the guild. This was an association of merchants or craftsmen in the same trade who lived in a town. They regulated admission to the guild by supervising apprenticeships and awarding licences to practice in that trade; they set standards for quality of work, and enforced these standards on their members. They also acted as a social club, organising feasts and celebrations through the year; they fulfilled particular functions within the wider life of the town, for example taking responsibility for certain aspects of the town’s religious life; and many set up schools for the education of children of their members (and for a fee, other children). In many towns, membership of a guild conferred citizenship of the town upon a person.
Growing class divisions
As trade expanded in the middle and high medieval period, the merchant classes grew in numbers, wealth and influence. From being humble traders in the tiny towns of about 1000, in status on a par with craftsmen, they evolved into merchants living in grand town houses with many servants. Their business interests could span many countries, even beyond Europe. They took over the running of the towns’ affairs through their control of the guilds they came to dominate. Many were able to pass on their wealth to their sons, and came to form an hereditary patrician elites, able to deal with dukes and counts on an equal basis.
Meanwhile, humbler craftsmen were unable to keep pace; they were still able to maintain themselves in economic independence, and had a respected place in urban society, but they were falling behind the merchants.
As for the lower orders in the towns, they found themselves increasingly frozen out of opportunities to better themselves. As merchants and even master craftsmen grew in wealth, more wealth was needed to join their ranks; and whereas in earlier times a poor townsmen could hope to rise to be a master of a workshop or trading enterprise, this became more and more difficult as the guilds came under the sway of small groups of wealthy masters. An urban proletariat began to appear in many towns, a poor labouring class as hereditary in their low rank as the patricians were in their high estate. These divisions inevitably bore fruit in the class tensions, often violent, which became more marked in towns and cities throughout Europe in the later Middle Ages.
Whatever one’s status, life in medieval towns was fraught with danger. As towns grew in population, they became more and more crowded. Streets were very narrow, as well as being noisy and dirty. People threw their waste (including human waste) out of their windows to the street below. In many streets an open sewer flowed down the middle. Conditions therefore tended to be appallingly filthy, and very unhealthy. Disease was a constant threat. Houses were made of flimsy, flammable materials and the threat of fire was never far away. Crime on medieval towns was far higher than in modern inner cities. The death rate was frighteningly high.
The clergy were a distinct and important element within medieval society.
There were two kinds of clergy: secular and regular. Broadly speaking, the secular clergy were the priests who served in the churches and cathedrals in towns and villages; the regular clergy were the monks, nuns and lay brothers and sisters who lived in monasteries or belonged to religious orders of wandering friars.
Another group of people who could be seen in many towns (but seldom in the countryside) across Europe were Jews, who had spread around Europe since Roman times. The reason why they were mostly confined to towns and cities was that in most places they were not allowed to own or rent land.
In the urban economy, however, the Jews played a key role. Lending money for profit was forbidden to Christians by Church; however, Jews were allowed by their own religion to lend on interest to non-Jews. In the early part of the Middle Ages, therefore, moneylending became a near-monopoly to them.
Some Jews became very rich – and as such, of course, attracted widespread envy. In fact, Jews came to be seen as extortionate moneylenders, and this, added to the fact that they were a group of outsiders who had not integrated with the rest of society, led to anti-Jewish feeling being common.
They were easy targets when things went wrong – in time of plague Jews were often accused of poisoning wells and other crimes, and anti-Jewish pogroms could all too easily occur. Also, when rulers found themselves in dire need of money (as medieval kings did frequently) one of their common expedients was to squeeze the Jewish community. The rest of society could be mostly be relied on to stand by when this happened. On several occasions all Jews were expelled from various kingdoms – England in 1290, France in 1306 and Spain in 1492. Many of these Jews emigrated to Poland, Hungary, Holland, Italy and Turkey.
For all people, there was nothing like the same privacy that we have come to expect in our own lives. Poorer families would live and eat together in single-room cottages, at night all sleeping in the one bed. In wealthier families, the owners of a house would share their house with servants and workers. Even in aristocratic households, the family itself might only have a few rooms to itself, with the main sections of the house shared with a host of retainers and servants.
For the majority of people, including young children, hours were long – all the hours of daylight were barely enough to get though the tasks needing doing to ensure survival. They did not have the labour-saving devices that we have today; almost everything had to be done by muscle power (human or animal).
Women were legally subject to men (though one would not necessarily have believed that from the work of medieval writers such as Boccaccio and Chaucer, who give pen portraits of assertive and powerful women). Women’s main role in society was to be as wives and mothers. In poorer families, they worked alongside their menfolk in field and workshop, as well as doing household chores – cooking, washing, cleaning, making clothes, grinding corn, making beer and so on. In fact, economic and household work was not demarcated as it is today, as all tasks were to do with ensuring they and their families were properly fed, watered and clothed.
In aristocratic circles the women wove, spun, and managed the domestic side of the household. In circumstances where the men were away or otherwise unable to manage affairs, the lady of the household took charge of everything – including, on more than one occasion, leading the defence of a castle against attack. Widows in particular could have a large measure of economic independence, and in many cases took over the ownership and management of their deceased husband’s business. Nuns of course lived lived lives largely free from male domination, and could rise to be Abbesses of their communities, holding positions of wide respect and great responsibility.
Children, education and literacy
Children took on adult roles at a young age. Children from poorer families were put to work in the family’s plot of land or workshop at the age of seven or so. If the family could afford to send them to school this too began at seven. Sons of craftsmen and merchants were sent to another household to be apprenticed to another master for seven years, learning how to follow in their trade. In aristocratic households, boys were sent to another household to be trained in military skills. They earned their keep by acting as servants in this household. Girls of all classes were trained in weaving, needlework, and all the household chores they would need when they had their own households to manage.
Until towards the end of the Middle Ages, the only people who had what we would call an “education” were those destined for a career in the church. The majority of the population were completely illiterate. Even aristocrats were mostly unable to read and write. Literacy was not regarded as a particularly valuable accomplishment for a gentleman, as he could delegate tasks involving reading and writing to clerks.
In English, the word “clerk” is closely linked to the word “cleric”, or churchman. This reflects the fact that, in medieval England and other northern European countries, the only people who were expected to be able to read and write were men and women of the church. Literacy was seen as a purely practical skill which clerics needed to have in order to do their work. Boys intended for a career in the church would be taught the rudiments of reading and writing by a local priest, before being sent to a monastery to progress their education. Here they would follow a curriculum known as the trivium, which consisted of grammar, rhetoric and logic.
Education was always more widespread in southern Europe, where urban life continued, albeit in a shrunken form, from Roman times and where education was never the exclusive preserve of the clergy. In later medieval times, education became more widespread in northern countries as well. Schools began to appear in towns, at first attached to cathedrals and large churches, later maintained by guilds or town councils (but still taught mostly by clergy and with a curriculum still focussed on grammar – hence the label grammar schools).
As society became more complex, more people had to learn to read and write. Administration and law increasingly involved written documents, so that anyone who managed manors or was involved in courts or administration needed to be able to read. The growth of long-distance business networks made letter-writing and account-keeping a necessity for merchants and their agents. With the coming of printing, books became much cheaper. Upper class people, both men and women, took to reading for pleasure. Education became the mark of a gentleman or gentlewomen.
From the late 11th century, a new kind of educational institution appeared, the university. The first of these was at Bologna, in northern Italy, but other universities soon appeared in Paris, Oxford, Cambridge and other places. In origin, they were communities of teachers (all clergymen) who banded together in a loose association to study and teach. By the 14th century some of these universities had acquired such an outstanding reputation that scholars came from all over Europe to study and to teach in them. These great centres of learning spread an international academic culture which has endured in Europe, the West up to the present day, and has now spread around the world. At first, the students who attended these universities were all intended for the church; however, others soon followed, especially the sons of noblemen who wished to study law.
Buildings and homes
Building styles and materials varied around Europe, but most poorer people would have lived in small cottages, usually of a single room and often with stalls next to them for the family’s animals. Massive stone castles housed powerful nobles, their family, retainers and domestic servants. These would be structured around a great hall in which the noblemen met with other nobles or with royal officials; and where great feasts were held on regular occasions. Manor houses were smaller versions of castles, also built around a large hall. in mid-medieval times these would have been fortified, true small castles; later, they were built for comfort and display, with many decorative features.
Churches were to be found in every village; and each town would have many churches. These were by far the most common public edifices, their towers and spires dominating the skyline. Most were built of stone or brick. Monasteries also dotted the countryside. These formed complexes of buildings – cloisters, dormitories, kitchens, store rooms, libraries, workshops, a mill – all gathered around a church. They could also be found in towns.
Other large town buildings were the guildhalls, where the merchants met together for business and pleasure, and the large houses of the merchants, built of stone, brick or timber, depending on the region. Stout stone walls surrounded most towns.
Villagers’ clothes were simple, consisting of woollen tunics for men and woollen dresses for women. Shoes were made from leather from the slaughtered animals.
Wealthier men would have brightly dyed cloaks and gowns to wear, with linen (or, for the wealthiest, silk) undergarments next to their skin. Richer women, likewise, would have various layers of garments, and also cloaks.
King Lothair I is shown in a cloak fastened on one shoulder
worn over a long-sleeved tunic and cross-gartered hose
Monks wore habits – plain, woollen garments, often with a hood. The habit reached to their feet. The top of their heads was shaven. Nun’s also wore habits. Their head and hair was almost covered by a headpiece (or “coif”).
The year was punctuated by many religious festivals, which were times for communal fun and games. Villages and towns (or their guilds) organised their own games, such as an early version of football, which were often rough and could be violent. Towns and villages had many inns, and drink flowed freely. spectator sports included cock fights and bear bating. In southern Europe, bull fighting
There were also plays, put on in the market place by local people, or by troops of travelling actors. Jugglers and acrobats also performed in the streets
The aristocratic also enjoyed feasting, which took place in the great halls of their castles and manor houses. They also enjoyed a form of entertainment called the tournament. Originally, this was more or less a mock battle between two sides of knights, and could be almost as dangerous as the real thing. Later they became much more formalised, with jousts between two knights. With the body armour of the contestants covering the face, their identity had to be proclaimed by unique patterns of symbols on their shields and banners. This practice gave rise to heraldry, by which family descent was represented symbolically by these patterns. This in term led to aristocratic families being demarcated from the rest of the population by heraldic coats of arms though which their families could be traced for generations.
Law and order
Law in medieval Europe was a hotch-potch of local custom, feudal practices, Roman law and Church law – together with laws issues by kings and parliaments. Much law was rough and ready – for example, that administered by hue and cry: if a thief was caught red-handed in the streets, a mob would chase him and beat him up (or, on occasion, kill him). This was part and parcel of the violent society which medieval Europe undoubtedly was. By modern standards, crime was horrifically high. The murder rate in most small towns was several time what it is in a modern inner city like New York ot Chicago. Whole stretches of countryside were inhabited by outlaw bands and off limits to law abiding folk. Fraud was rife in trade, wholesale corruption was embedded in government. Women habitually left unwanted babies to die in the open (hence the idea of children being found under mulberry bushes). It was a rough, tough, violent world, not for the faint hearted.
Most people’s experience of law courts would have been in their local manor court, which settled disputes between neighbours and tried petty crimes. These courts were presided over by the lord of the manor, or by his official (usually a villager who had the respect of the other villagers). The towns had their own courts, presided over by the town’s magistrates.
More serious crimes were tried in the courts of magnates or in royal courts. These latter tended to become more used as time went by. A professional body of royal judges grew up who had the expertise to try cases more professionally than in the feudal courts. In most of western Europe they drew more and more on Roman law, while in England they drew on a growing body of common law.